Page 26 - 1923 VES Meteor

70 TnE )Ir-:TEOR
fact, the ~ccond period was merely a repetition of the first in regard to tho points scored, the only difference being that we made 12 points instea~ of 10. From start to finish the contest was ,·cry exciting and well worth being seen. The entire Freshmen team played in stellar fashion, but their vi<::tory was largely dne to the spleudid floor work of Via, and ::Monutcustle's accurate shooting. Lee's work was the most outstanding f1·om a Y. E. S. standpoint.
The lineups and score:
U. Va. Freshmen V. E. S.
Mountcastle ...... . .....L. F..... ... .... ..... Rogers Bro\vn ................R. F................. Frazier Bradford ...............C........·........ Goldsmith \Vrenn ....... ... ... . ..L. G.................... Lee Via. ...................R. G.................. Terry
Summary: Field goals-)Iountcastle 8, Brown 3, Brad- ford 2, Wren 2, Via 1, Hobbs 1, Rogers 3, Lee 2, Terry 1, :Mead 3. Foul goals-Bradford (3 out o£ 6), :Mountcastle
(1 out of 1). Frazier (4 out of 6). Substitutions-H. Va., Lacy for Bradford; Hobbs for Brown; Bradford for Lacy; Joues for Wrenn; Bramble for Bradford. Y. E. S., :1Iead for Goldsmith; Goldsmith for )fend; :1fend for Rogers. Re- feree-Campbell (V. ){. I.).
W. & L. (Freshmen), 30-V. E. S., 33
On Febn1ary 8th, in a game that will long be remembered as being the most exciting; the most tense, and the most thrill- ing that was ever seen in the Barksdale gymnasium, we o•ercame the crack Washington and Lee University Fresh- men quintet with a scant margin of but three points to our credit. The score was 33 to 30. The contest was a breath- less struggle from start to finish and at no time throughout could the winner bo picked, tho outcome being decided only at